🆚 Ruby on Rails vs. Vapor
- 📈 Ruby on Rails is much more popular than Vapor.
- 🌍 Ruby on Rails is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Vapor is particularly popular in Russia.
Type
About
Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web application framework that provides the tools needed to build database-driven applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.
It emphasizes a standardized project structure and naming, follows DRY ("don't repeat yourself") and "convention over configuration" principles, includes the Active Record ORM for database interaction, a built-in asset pipeline for managing CSS and
JavaScript, and an integrated testing framework.
Vapor is a server-side HTTP web framework written in Swift used for building RESTful APIs, web applications, and real-time features via
WebSockets.
It offers a non-blocking architecture based on SwiftNIO, a type-safe ORM called Fluent supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL,
MongoDB, and
SQLite, Leaf templating, built-in authentication (including
JWT), middleware, and validation.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Pakistan in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🥇 Most popular in New Zealand in the Backend Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Rack