🆚 Rough.js vs. Vivus
- 📈 Vivus is much more popular than Rough.js.
- 🌎 Vivus is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Rough.js is more popular in Moldova.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Rough.js is a small graphics library that lets you draw in a sketchy, hand-drawn style.
Vivus is a lightweight JavaScript library that allows you to animate SVGs, giving them the appearance of being drawn.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Vivus JavaScript library is 6 times more popular than Rough.js.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Vivus is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while Rough.js is more popular in Moldova.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
Japan
India
Spain
Australia
Netherlands
Turkey
Awards
- ⬆️ 187th most popular in the Netherlands in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 187th most popular in Australia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 203rd most popular in the United Kingdom in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 211st most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 219th most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Turkey in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Argentina in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Pakistan in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Serbia in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Italy in the Animation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Vivus is more popular than Rough.js in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Paper.js