🆚 Ruffle vs. SWFObject
- 📈 SWFObject is much more popular than Ruffle.
- 🌍 SWFObject is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Ruffle is an Adobe Flash Player emulator written in the Rust programming language.
SWFObject is a deprecated framework for detecting the Adobe Flash Player plugin and embedding Flash (swf) files.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The SWFObject JavaScript library is 14 times more popular than Ruffle.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
SWFObject is more popular than Ruffle in all countries.
United States
Russia
Japan
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Poland
Italy
China
Spain
Awards
- ⬆️ 127th most popular in China in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 190th most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 212nd most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 223rd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Russia in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Slovakia in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Ukraine in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Latvia in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Kazakhstan in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
SWFObject is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and education and reference, while Ruffle is more commonly used on fashion and beauty sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Online Shopping
Games
Travel
General News
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.