🆚 Scully vs. VitePress

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Static site generator
Static site generator

About

Scully is a static site generator for Angular projects looking to embrace the Jamstack.

VitePress is a Vue-powered static site generator and successor to VuePress, built on top of the Vite build tool.

It provides a Markdown-first workflow with Vue components, fast development updates through Vite's module system, automatic routing and sidebar generation, support for TypeScript and JSX in Markdown, built-in search indexing, a theming system, and static HTML output with minimal client-side JavaScript.

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The VitePress static site generator is 2.7 times more popular than Scully.
Total websites

Market share

Static Site Generators

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

VitePress is more popular in the United States, China, and Japan, while Scully is more popular in Germany, the United Kingdom, and France.
United States
China
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
Australia
Hong Kong
France
Canada
Finland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

VitePress is more popular among sites focused on software and hardware, Internet services, and technical information, while Scully is more commonly used on business, finance and banking, and online shopping sites.
Software/Hardware
Business
Internet Services
Technical Information
Technical/Business Forums
Education/Reference
Games
Finance/Banking
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#12,564
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#6,061
#29,061
#29,726
#42,883
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.