🆚 Sift vs. ThreatMetrix
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 ThreatMetrix is five times more popular than Sift.
- 🌎 ThreatMetrix is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
- 🌍 Sift is more popular in Colombia, Malaysia, and Sweden.
Type
About
It draws on behavior, device, and identity signals and a global data network of over one trillion annual events to generate real-time risk scores. It claims to reduce chargebacks significantly, detect and block account takeover attempts using device fingerprinting and MFA, protect against spam, scams, and phishing in user-generated content through text clustering, and integrate with custom workflows and rules engines for more precise fraud operations.
It combines a global shared identity network, embedded machine learning, and behavioral biometrics to distinguish trusted users from fraudsters. In addition, it monitors signals from devices, locations, and past behavior to detect anomalies such as account takeover, payment fraud, or use of spoofed devices.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 24th most popular in the United States in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Brazil in the Fraud Prevention category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Switzerland in the Fraud Prevention category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Fraud Prevention category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Canada in the Fraud Prevention category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Germany in the Fraud Prevention category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
Data updated
* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.