🆚 Stylelint vs. TSLint
- 📈 Stylelint is much more popular than TSLint.
- 🌍 Stylelint is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
StylelintType
CSS tool
Static code analysis tool
About
Stylelint is an open-source 
CSS linter built on 
PostCSS that helps developers detect errors and enforce consistent coding conventions in CSS, 
Sass, and Less stylesheets.
It includes more than 100 built-in rules, automatically fixes many issues, and supports custom rules, plugins, and shareable configurations.
TSLint is a static code analysis tool for 
TypeScript that has been deprecated in favor of ESLint.
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
CSS Tools › Rank #4
Static Code Analysis › Rank #2
Static Code Analysis › Rank #6
Legacy › Rank #123
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Stylelint CSS tool is 364 times more popular than TSLint.
Total websites
Market share
Static Code Analysis
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Stylelint is more popular than TSLint in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Spain
France
Canada
Australia
Italy
Ukraine
Netherlands
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Ukraine in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Static Code Analysis category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Stylelint is more popular than TSLint in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Travel
Internet Services
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,009,087 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.