🆚 Sucuri CloudProxy vs. Varnish
- 📈 Varnish is five times more popular than Sucuri CloudProxy.
- 🌎 Varnish is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.
- 🌍 Sucuri CloudProxy is more popular in the United Arab Emirates, Sri Lanka, and Qatar.
Sucuri CloudProxy
VarnishType
About
Sucuri CloudProxy is a website application firewall that stops bad actors, speeds up load times, and increases website availability.
Varnish Cache is an open-source HTTP accelerator and reverse caching proxy that caches content from web servers to reduce load times, and supports native TLS termination and 
Kubernetes deployments.
It uses the VCL configuration language compiled to native C code, serves cached responses in three system calls, provides official container images and a Helm chart for Kubernetes, outputs structured 
JSON logs, and supports VMOD extension modules.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Load Balancers category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in India in the Load Balancers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Ireland in the Load Balancers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United Arab Emirates in the Load Balancers category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Italy in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Denmark in the Load Balancers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.