🆚 Thin vs. Tomcat
- 📈 Tomcat is much more popular than Thin.
- 🌍 Tomcat is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Thin
TomcatType
Web server
Web server
About
Thin is a fast and simple Ruby web server.
Apache Tomcat is an open-source 
Java application server that implements the 
Jakarta Servlet, 
Jakarta Server Pages, Jakarta Expression Language, and Jakarta 
WebSocket specifications.
It provides a servlet container and JSP engine for running Java web applications, supports 
HTTP/2 and virtual threads, implements a curated subset of Jakarta EE for lightweight deployment, and offers TLS certificate reload without downtime.
Headquarters
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
tomcat.apache.orgPricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Tomcat web server is 1,632 times more popular than Thin.
Total websites
Market share
Web Servers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Tomcat is more popular than Thin in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Canada
New Zealand
Netherlands
Germany
Norway
Korea
Switzerland
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in New Zealand in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Australia in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Canada in the Web Servers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Tomcat is more popular than Thin in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Restaurants
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Travel
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.