🆚 Underscore.js vs. WebTorrent
- 📈 Underscore.js is much more popular than WebTorrent.
- 🌍 Underscore.js is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ WebTorrent is particularly popular in Ireland.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Underscore.js is a utility library for 
JavaScript that provides support for functional programming helpers (each, map, reduce, filter) without extending any built-in JavaScript objects.
WebTorrent is a streaming torrent client for 
Node.js and the browser.
Headquarters
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #17
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #308
ShopifyPopularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Underscore.js JavaScript library is 24,315 times more popular than WebTorrent.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Underscore.js is more popular than WebTorrent in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Spain
Italy
France
Australia
India
Netherlands
Canada
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Guyana in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Fiji in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Ghana in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Senegal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Trinidad and Tobago in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Underscore.js is more popular than WebTorrent in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Entertainment
Travel
Internet Services
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
jQuery
Lodash
Socket.io
SignalR🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
