🆚 Vultr Object Storage vs. Wasabi
- 📈 Wasabi is much more popular than Vultr Object Storage.
- 🌎 Wasabi is more popular in the United States, Russia, and Switzerland.
- 🌍 Vultr Object Storage is more popular in New Zealand.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service
About
Vultr Object Storage is an 
S3-compatible object storage service from the American hosting provider Vultr.
Wasabi is cloud storage that does not charge for egress or API requests and can cost up to 80% less than the competition.
Headquarters
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
1TB of storage + 1 TB of bandwidth $18+/month
$6.99+/TB/month
Categories
Cloud Storages › Rank #20
Cloud Storages › Rank #12
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Wasabi cloud storage service is 7 times more popular than Vultr Object Storage.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Storages
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Wasabi is more popular in the United States, Russia, and Switzerland, while Vultr Object Storage is more popular in New Zealand.
United States
Russia
Switzerland
United Kingdom
India
Brazil
Indonesia
Australia
New Zealand
Japan
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Wasabi is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and blogs and wiki, while Vultr Object Storage is more commonly used on alcohol sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
General News
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Real Estate
Motor Vehicles
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.