🆚 W3.CSS vs. YAML Framework

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

W3.CSS is an open-source, pure CSS framework developed by the W3Schools team, designed for building responsive websites without JavaScript.

It offers a mobile-first grid system, flexbox-based layout components, a variety of CSS classes for cards, lists, buttons, navigation bars, modals, colors, and margins, and 50 pre-built responsive templates.

YAML (Yet Another Multicolumn Layout) is a modular and lightweight CSS framework for flexible, accessible and responsive websites.

Headquarters

Sandnes, Norway
Berlin, Germany

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

UI Frameworks › Rank #14
UI Frameworks › Rank #28

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The W3.CSS UI framework is 5 times more popular than YAML Framework.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

W3.CSS is more popular in the United States, India, and the United Kingdom, while YAML Framework is more popular in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.
United States
Germany
India
Switzerland
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Thailand
Canada
Brazil

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

W3.CSS is more popular than YAML Framework in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Travel
Public Information
Internet Services
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Government/Military

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#4,159
#6,676
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#15,591
#54,408
#54,668
#54,776
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.