Traffective CMP

Traffective, Munich, Germany

Traffective Consent Management is an integrated solution for compliance with the GDPR.

According to our data, Traffective CMP ranks 41th among the consent management platforms we track.
It has 0.06% of the consent management market share and is detected on 0.006% of all websites.

πŸ“Š Rankings and Market Share

πŸ† Traffective CMP Awards

⚑ Sites Using Traffective CMP

We have data on 208 websites that use the Traffective CMP consent management platform. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.

The highest rated site using Traffective CMP is merkur.de.

#WebsiteRankCountryLanguage
1 merkur.de #572 Germany German
2 fr.de #2,091 Germany German
3 markt.de #2,231 Germany German
4 hna.de #3,309 Germany German
5 ruhr24.de #3,642 Germany German
6 presseportal.de #5,541 Germany German
7 mopo.de #6,284 Germany German
8 kreiszeitung.de #7,785 Germany German
9 wa.de #8,120 Germany German
10 ludwigshafen24.de #10,983 Germany German
11 pnp.de #13,057 Germany German
12 schwaebische-post.de #14,533 Germany German
13 donaukurier.de #15,142 Germany German
14 fnp.de #18,057 Germany German
15 tz.de #18,237 Germany German
16 eishockeynews.de #19,090 Germany German
17 rnz.de #21,477 Germany German
18 mittelbayerische.de #22,017 Germany German
19 op-online.de #22,230 Germany German
20 serienjunkies.de #23,019 Germany German

πŸ“ˆ Usage Statistics

Most of the sites that use Traffective CMP:

Most of the sites using Traffective CMP are from Germany and Austria.

  • Germany 83.5%
  • Austria 6.8%
  • Spain 4.4%
  • United States 1.5%
  • France 1%
  • United Kingdom 1%
  • Belgium 0.5%
  • Brazil 0.5%
  • Poland 0.5%
  • Other 0.3%

Most Traffective CMP users speak German, English, or Spanish.

  • German 88%
  • English 5.8%
  • Spanish 5.8%
  • Portuguese 0.5%

The Traffective CMP consent management platform is especially popular on .de, .com, and .at top-level domains.

  • .de 72.6%
  • .com 15.4%
  • .at 5.8%
  • .net 1%
  • .info 1%
  • .news 1%
  • .es 0.5%
  • .ch 0.5%
  • .gov.uk 0.5%
  • Other 1.7%

The primary market segments for websites utilizing Traffective CMP include general news, sports, and blogs and wiki.

  • General News 43.7%
  • Sports 7%
  • Blogs/Wiki 5.6%
  • Education/Reference 4.9%
  • Portal Sites 4.2%
  • Marketing/Merchandising 3.5%
  • Public Information 3.5%
  • Entertainment 3.5%
  • Health 2.8%
  • Other 21.3%

πŸ•΅οΈ Similar Technologies

These are some of the best Traffective CMP alternatives.

RankName
2
Complianz
Groningen, Netherlands

An automated and customizable cookie consent plugin for WordPress and Shopify that supports GDPR, ePrivacy, CCPA, and other regional privacy requirements.

Free$59+
3
Cookiebot
Munich, Germany

A cookie consent and compliance platform that automates obtaining user consent for cookies and tracking and helps websites comply with data privacy regulations.

Free$8+/month
4
OneTrust
Atlanta, Georgia, United States

A privacy management platform that helps organizations manage consent, data privacy, vendor risk, and compliance workflows.

$30+/month
5
Iubenda
Milan, Italy

A privacy compliance platform for websites and apps that generates consent banners, manages regional privacy requirements, and blocks cookies and trackers until users grant consent.

Free$6.99+/month
40
Clickskeks
Bonn, Germany

A consent management platform designed specifically for Austrian and German customers.

€5.90+/month

πŸ†š Compare Alternatives

Compare Traffective CMP to…

πŸ’¬ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the company behind Traffective CMP?

Traffective CMP is owned by Traffective GmbH, headquartered in Munich, Germany.

Which country uses Traffective CMP the most?

The majority of Traffective CMP users are from Germany.

Who uses Traffective CMP?

According to our data, Traffective CMP is used on hundreds of sites, including such established ones as merkur.de, fr.de, and markt.de.

What are the alternatives to Traffective CMP?

Alternatives and possible competitors to Traffective CMP may include Clickskeks, Complianz, and Cookiebot.

πŸ‘‰ See Also

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.