Glitch
Fastly, San Francisco, California, United StatesGlitch was a collaborative programming environment that was shut down after being acquired by Fastly.
According to our data, Glitch ranks 69th among the legacy technologies we track.
It has 0.05% of the legacy market share and is detected on 0.01% of all websites.
📊 Rankings and Market Share
- Legacy
- Rank: 69
- Market share: 0.05%
🏆 Glitch Awards
- ⬆️ 62nd most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
⚡ Sites Using Glitch
We have data on 425 websites that use Glitch legacy technology. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.
The highest rated site using Glitch is vcu.edu.
| # | Website | Rank | Country | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #8,337 | United States | English | |
| 2 | #17,553 | Australia | English | |
| 3 | #23,329 | United States | English | |
| 4 | #40,766 | Colombia | Spanish | |
| 5 | #40,872 | Japan | English | |
| 6 | #57,299 | United States | English | |
| 7 | #82,589 | English | ||
| 8 | #82,876 | United States | American English | |
| 9 | #103,180 | United States | English | |
| 10 | #115,051 | English | ||
| 11 | #122,273 | United States | English | |
| 12 |  developer.x.com |
United States | English | |
| 13 | #170,271 | English | ||
| 14 | #204,792 | Japan | Japanese | |
| 15 | #215,734 | United States | English | |
| 16 | #236,948 | United States | American English | |
| 17 | #240,621 | United States | English | |
| 18 | #243,554 | United States | English | |
| 19 | #259,623 | English | ||
| 20 | #284,438 | China | English |
📈 Usage Statistics
Most of the sites that use Glitch:
- are located in the United States
- have content in English
- use the .com domain extension
- fall into the Real Estate category.
Most of the sites using Glitch are from the United States and Vietnam.
- United States 69.3%
- Vietnam 8%
- United Kingdom 2.7%
- Canada 2.2%
- Australia 1.8%
- Japan 1.8%
- Indonesia 1.3%
- Belgium 0.9%
- China 0.9%
- Other 11.1%
Most Glitch users speak English or Vietnamese.
- English 90.1%
- Vietnamese 5.2%
- Dutch 0.7%
- German 0.5%
- French 0.5%
- Japanese 0.5%
- Indonesian 0.5%
- Malay 0.5%
- Russian 0.2%
- Other 1.3%
Glitch legacy technology is especially popular on .com top-level domains.
- .com 84.9%
- .org 2.1%
- .net 1.2%
- .io 1.2%
- .jp 0.7%
- .com.au 0.7%
- .co 0.5%
- .sg 0.5%
- .vn 0.5%
- Other 7.7%
The primary market segments for websites utilizing Glitch include real estate, business, and finance and banking.
- Real Estate 61.5%
- Business 8.5%
- Finance/Banking 5.4%
- Internet Services 4.6%
- Software/Hardware 3.1%
- Education/Reference 2.3%
- Personal Pages 2.3%
- Blogs/Wiki 1.5%
- Marketing/Merchandising 0.8%
- Other 10%
🕵️ Similar Technologies
These are some of the best Glitch alternatives.
🆚 Compare Alternatives
Compare Glitch to…
- 🕵️ Similar technologies
- ⭐ Market leaders
- 💡 More alternatives
- 🔎 All options
💬 Frequently Asked Questions
What is the company behind Glitch?
Glitch is owned by Fastly, Inc., headquartered in San Francisco, California, United States.
Which country uses Glitch the most?
The majority of Glitch users are from the United States.
Who uses Glitch?
According to our data, Glitch is used on hundreds of sites, including such established ones as vcu.edu,
tafeqld.edu.au, and
fisglobal.com.
Do academic institutions use Glitch?
Yes. The most prominent of these are vcu.edu and
tafeqld.edu.au.
How does Glitch stack up against the competition?
Glitch is a moderately popular legacy technology, ranking ahead of 61 other legacy technologies we track.
What are the alternatives to Glitch?
Alternatives and possible competitors to Glitch may include 
Google URL Shortener, 
AddThis, and 
Messenger Customer Chat.
👉 See Also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.