MPL License

Mozilla, Mountain View, California, United States

The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license that is more restrictive than the permissive software BSD-style licenses.

According to our data, MPL is the 6th most popular open-source license on the web.
It has 0.09% of the license market share and is detected on <0.001% of all websites.

πŸ“Š Rankings and Market Share

⚑ Sites Using MPL License

We have data on 15 websites that use the MPL license.

The highest rated site using MPL is brave.com.

#WebsiteRankCountryLanguage
1 brave.com #1,368 English
2 webextension.org #65,810 English
3 rabbitmq.com #181,884 English
4 mozfr.org #206,332 France French
5 frontspin.com #477,405 American English
6 ganggarrison.com #577,792 United States English
7 microblocks.fun #629,459 Spain English
8 taglib.org #751,807
9 jreleaser.org #802,218 English
10 srihash.org #960,846 United States English
11 libeigen.gitlab.io United States English
12 lu.is United States American English
13 tinyportal.net Canada American English
14 bach.sh Saint Helena English
15 ffii.se Sweden Swedish

πŸ“ˆ Usage Statistics

Most of the sites that use MPL:

Most of the sites using MPL License are from the United States, Canada, and France.

  • United States 44.4%
  • Canada 11.1%
  • France 11.1%
  • Saint Helena 11.1%
  • Spain 11.1%
  • Sweden 11.1%
  • Other 0.1%

Most MPL License users speak English, French, or Swedish.

  • English 85.7%
  • French 7.1%
  • Swedish 7.1%
  • Other 0.1%

The MPL license is especially popular on .org, .com, and .net top-level domains.

  • .org 33.3%
  • .com 26.7%
  • .net 6.7%
  • .io 6.7%
  • .se 6.7%
  • .is 6.7%
  • .sh 6.7%
  • .fun 6.7%

The primary market segments for websites utilizing MPL License include software and hardware, and business.

  • Software/Hardware 60%
  • Business 40%

πŸ”’ MPL License Versions

The most common version of MPL License is 2.0, used by 86.7% of sites.

  • 2.0 86.7%
  • Unknown 13.3%

πŸ•΅οΈ Similar Technologies

These are some of the best MPL License alternatives.

RankName
1
Creative Commons License
Mountain View, California, United States

A set of standardized copyright licenses that let creators share their works with the public while clearly defining how others may use, remix, or redistribute them under specific conditions.

2
GNU License
Boston, Massachusetts, United States

The GNU General Public Licenses are a family of free, copyleft software licenses created to guarantee users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify software while ensuring those freedoms are preserved when the software is distributed.

3
MIT License
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

A permissive software license that allows reuse, modification, distribution, and commercial use without requiring source code disclosure.

4
Apache License
Wilmington, Delaware, United States

A permissive software license that allows use, modification, distribution, and commercial use without requiring source code disclosure.

5
BSD License
Boulder, Colorado, United States

A family of permissive free software licenses that allow software to be used, modified, and redistributed with minimal restrictions.

πŸ†š Compare Alternatives

Compare MPL License to…

πŸ’¬ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the company behind MPL License?

MPL License is owned by the Mozilla Foundation, headquartered in Mountain View, California, United States.

Which country uses MPL License the most?

The majority of MPL License users are from the United States.

Who uses MPL License?

According to our data, MPL License is used on at least 15 sites, including such established ones as brave.com, webextension.org, and rabbitmq.com.

What are the alternatives to MPL License?

Alternatives and possible competitors to MPL License may include GNU License, Creative Commons License, and MIT License.

πŸ‘‰ See Also

πŸ—ƒοΈ About This Data