Zola

Zola is a fast static site generator written in Rust.

According to our data, Zola ranks 24th among the static site generators we track.
It has 0.2% of the static site generator market share and is detected on 0.001% of all websites.

πŸ’Έ Pricing

Zola is available for free.

Free βœ”οΈOpen source

πŸ“Š Rankings and Market Share

⚑ Sites Powered by Zola

We have data on 32 websites that use the Zola static site generator. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.

The highest rated site using Zola is nakryiko.com.

#WebsiteRankCountryLanguage
1 nakryiko.com #459,502 United States English
2 organicmaps.app #577,761 English
3 bneijt.nl #663,746 Netherlands English
4 henryyuen.net #706,955 United States English
5 voxel.wiki #831,034 Germany American English
6 nomacs.org #970,173 American English
7 thejpster.org.uk #1,521,086 United Kingdom English
8 fy.blackhats.net.au Australia English
9 duniter.org France English
10 haskellbook.com United Kingdom English
11 forgefed.org English
12 kytta.dev English
13 nocduro.com United States English
14 nboisvert.com English
15 divisionbyzero.net United States English
16 linmob.net Germany English
17 merenbach.com United States English
18 daudix.one Ireland English
19 xr.io Sweden English
20 duniter.fr France French

πŸ“ˆ Usage Statistics

Most of the sites that use Zola:

Most of the sites using Zola are from the United States, France, and the United Kingdom.

  • United States 38.5%
  • France 11.5%
  • United Kingdom 11.5%
  • Germany 7.7%
  • Australia 3.8%
  • Austria 3.8%
  • India 3.8%
  • Ireland 3.8%
  • Japan 3.8%
  • Other 11.8%

Most Zola users speak English, French, or Chinese.

  • English 93.8%
  • French 3.1%
  • Chinese 3.1%

The Zola static site generator is especially popular on .com, .org, and .net top-level domains.

  • .com 28.1%
  • .org 18.8%
  • .net 9.4%
  • .fr 6.3%
  • .info 3.1%
  • .nl 3.1%
  • .ch 3.1%
  • .io 3.1%
  • .net.au 3.1%
  • Other 21.9%

The primary market segments for websites utilizing Zola include blogs and wiki, Internet services, and personal pages.

  • Blogs/Wiki 33.3%
  • Internet Services 16.7%
  • Personal Pages 16.7%
  • Software/Hardware 16.7%
  • Technical/Business Forums 16.7%

πŸ”’ Zola Versions

The most common version of Zola is 0.16, used by 66.7% of sites where versions were detected.

  • 0.16 66.7%
  • 0.19 33.3%

πŸ•΅οΈ Similar Technologies

These are some of the best Zola alternatives.

RankName
1
Gatsby
San Francisco, California, United States

An open-source static site generator built on React and Node.js that creates fast pre-rendered websites.

FreeOpen source
2
Astro

A web build tool optimized for creating fast, content-driven websites using server-rendered HTML and an Islands architecture for partial hydration.

FreeOpen source
3
Hugo

A static site generator written in Go that focuses on speed, flexibility and structured content organization.

FreeOpen source
4
Jekyll

A static site generator written in Ruby.

FreeOpen source
17
Quarto
Boston, Massachusetts, United States

An open-source scientific and technical publishing system based on Markdown that allows users to write in plain-text Markdown or work with Jupyter notebooks and embed executable code in Python, R, Julia, or Observable JS.

FreeOpen source

πŸ†š Compare Alternatives

Compare Zola to…

πŸ’¬ Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Zola for free?

Yes, it is a free static site generator.
It is also an open source solution, and its code is available on GitHub.

Which country uses Zola the most?

The majority of Zola users are from the United States.

Who uses Zola?

According to our data, Zola is used on at least 32 sites, including such established ones as nakryiko.com, organicmaps.app, and bneijt.nl.

How does Zola stack up against the competition?

Zola is a moderately popular static site generator, ranking ahead of 12 other static site generators we track.

What are the alternatives to Zola?

Alternatives and possible competitors to Zola may include Gatsby, Astro, and Jekyll.

πŸ‘‰ See Also

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.