🆚 accessiBe vs. Silktide

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Accessibility technology
Accessibility technology

About

accessiBe is a web accessibility solution that uses AI to help websites address accessibility barriers and align with ADA and WCAG standards.

It provides automated scanning and AI-based remediation of common WCAG 2.1 issues, a customizable accessibility interface with pre-built profiles and UI adjustments, support for screen reader optimization and keyboard navigation, and multilingual interfaces.

Silktide is a web governance platform that helps large organizations improve accessibility, content quality, and user experience.

Headquarters

Tel Aviv, Israel
San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌Free 7-day trial
AccessWidget$59+/month
AccessFlow$1,290+/month
Customized for each customer

Categories

Accessibility › Rank #2
Accessibility › Rank #17
Widgets › Rank #13
Analytics › Rank #116
SEO › Rank #23

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

AccessiBe accessibility technology is 42 times more popular than Silktide.
Total websites

Market share

Accessibility

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

accessiBe is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Italy, while Silktide is more popular in Norway, Slovenia, and Latvia.
United States
Canada
Italy
United Kingdom
Israel
Germany
Australia
Austria
France
Sweden

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

accessiBe is more popular than Silktide in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Fashion/Beauty
Real Estate
Finance/Banking
Travel

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,206
#1,333
#1,539
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#7,482
#7,667
#8,113
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.