🆚 Acquia DAM vs. Icecat

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Digital asset management software
Product information management system

About

Acquia DAM is a cloud-based digital asset management (DAM) and product information management (PIM) platform that helps teams manage digital assets, product specifications, and marketing copy.

Icecat delivers Product Information Management As-A-Service to brand owners that want to increase their product visibility.

Headquarters

Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
On request
Content Users
Open Icecat
Free ✔️Sponsored Brands Only
Full Icecat
Starter$375+/month
1 Vertical$650+/month
Complete$3,750+/month
Brands
Brand Cloud
Free version ✔️
Starter$1,200+/year
Open Icecat
Standard$1,500+/year
Rich$3,750+/year

Categories

DAM › Rank #4
PIM › Rank #3
PIM › Rank #8

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Acquia DAM software solution is 7 times more popular than Icecat.
Total websites

Market share

PIM

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Acquia DAM is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Australia, while Icecat is more popular in the Netherlands, Italy, and Belgium.
United States
Germany
Australia
Netherlands
Canada
Italy
Belgium
France
United Kingdom
Switzerland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Acquia DAM is more popular than Icecat in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Software/Hardware
Education/Reference
Finance/Banking
Real Estate
Internet Services
Travel

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#3,892
#12,060
#28,330
#32,438
#38,006
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.