🆚 Adobe DreamWeaver vs. Google Sites
- 📈 Adobe DreamWeaver is much more popular than Google Sites.
- 🌍 Adobe DreamWeaver is more popular in all countries.
Adobe DreamWeaver
Google SitesType
About
Adobe Dreamweaver is a proprietary WYSIWYG editor from Adobe that provides both visual design tools and full source-code editing for building websites.
It includes five starter templates, code editing with a Chromium-based Live View rendering engine, 
Git integration, and can be extended with add-ons available through Adobe Creative Cloud or third-party vendors.
Google Sites is a free website builder by Google for creating collaborative websites integrated with Google Workspace.
It provides real-time collaborative editing similar to 
Google Docs, automatic responsive layouts, page-level access permissions, publishing under Google or custom domains, version history with page restoration, and integration with 
Google Drive.
Headquarters
adobe.comPricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Website Builders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the HTML Editors category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.