🆚 Adobe Experience Manager vs. SilverStripe
- 📈 Adobe Experience Manager is five times more popular than SilverStripe.
- 🌎 Adobe Experience Manager is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 SilverStripe is more popular in New Zealand and Slovenia.
Type
About
Adobe Experience Manager is a software solution that's equal part content management system (CMS) and digital asset management (DAM) system.
It includes both headless and hybrid CMS models, enterprise-grade DAM capabilities with AI-powered asset tagging and automatic renditions, cloud-delivered scalability, multilingual and multisite support, and workflow/version control for teams.
SilverStripe is an open-source content management system written in PHP for building content-driven websites.
It is based on an MVC framework and offers structured content modeling, customizable templates, inline editing, versioning, role-based permissions, REST and GraphQL APIs for headless use, and an extension ecosystem with several thousand community modules available through Packagist.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the DAM category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Slovenia in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Denmark in the CMS category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
