🆚 Croogo vs. SilverStripe
- 📈 SilverStripe is much more popular than Croogo.
- 🌎 SilverStripe is more popular in New Zealand, Germany, and the United States.
- 🌍 Croogo is more popular in Croatia, Bangladesh, and Sudan.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
SilverStripeType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Croogo is an open-source content management system built with 
PHP and the CakePHP MVC framework.
SilverStripe is an open-source content management system written in PHP.
It is based on its own MVC framework and offers structured content modeling, customizable templates, inline editing, versioning, role-based permissions, REST and 
GraphQL APIs for headless use, and an extension ecosystem with several thousand community modules available through Packagist.
Headquarters
Wellington, New Zealand
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The SilverStripe CMS is 49 times more popular than Croogo.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
SilverStripe is more popular in New Zealand, Germany, and the United States, while Croogo is more popular in Croatia, Bangladesh, and Sudan.
New Zealand
Germany
United States
Australia
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Netherlands
Slovenia
Denmark
Canada
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
SilverStripe is more popular than Croogo in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Education/Reference
Health
Entertainment
Recreation/Hobbies
Public Information
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Joomla
Drupal
Pixelfed CMS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.