🆚 CMSimple_XH vs. SilverStripe
- 📈 SilverStripe is much more popular than CMSimple_XH.
- 🌍 SilverStripe is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ CMSimple_XH is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
CMSimple_XH is a flat file content management system that was forked from CMSimple.
SilverStripe is an open-source content management system written in 
PHP for building content-driven websites.
It is based on an MVC framework and offers structured content modeling, customizable templates, inline editing, versioning, role-based permissions, REST and 
GraphQL APIs for headless use, and an extension ecosystem with several thousand community modules available through Packagist.
Headquarters
Germany
Wellington, New Zealand
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The SilverStripe CMS is 56 times more popular than CMSimple_XH.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
SilverStripe is more popular than CMSimple_XH in all countries.
New Zealand
Germany
United States
Australia
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Netherlands
Slovenia
Denmark
Austria
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Slovenia in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Denmark in the CMS category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
SilverStripe is more popular than CMSimple_XH in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Education/Reference
Health
Entertainment
Recreation/Hobbies
Internet Services
Public Information
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Statamic
Bludit
Joomla
Drupal🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.