🆚 CMSimple_XH vs. Statamic
- 📈 Statamic is much more popular than CMSimple_XH.
- 🌍 Statamic is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ CMSimple_XH is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
CMSimple_XH is a flat file content management system that was forked from CMSimple.
Statamic is a flexible content management system built on Laravel that can operate as a full-stack or headless CMS, using flat files or a database, and can generate static sites.
It stores content in Markdown and
YAML by default, includes a customizable control panel, supports version control workflows with
Git, and offers features such as collections, taxonomies, asset management, and form handling.
Headquarters
Germany
Ormond Beach, Florida, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️Core, open source
Pro
First year$275
Updates$65/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Statamic CMS is 38 times more popular than CMSimple_XH.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Statamic is more popular than CMSimple_XH in all countries.
Germany
United States
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Switzerland
Australia
Canada
Belgium
Sweden
Austria
Awards
- 🔥 16th most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Belgium in the CMS category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Canada in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Statamic is more popular than CMSimple_XH in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Health
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Online Shopping
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
GetSimple
Pico