🆚 Pico vs. Statamic
- 📈 Statamic is much more popular than Pico.
- 🌍 Statamic is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Pico is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Pico
StatamicType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Pico is a simple, fast, flat file CMS.
Statamic is a flexible content management system built on 
Laravel that can operate as a full-stack or headless CMS, using flat files or a database, and can generate static sites.
It stores content in 
Markdown and 
YAML by default, includes a customizable control panel, supports version control workflows with 
Git, and offers features such as collections, taxonomies, asset management, and form handling.
Headquarters
Ormond Beach, Florida, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️Core, open source
Pro
First year$275
Updates$65/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Statamic CMS is 175 times more popular than Pico.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Statamic is more popular than Pico in all countries.
Germany
United States
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Switzerland
Australia
Canada
Belgium
Austria
Sweden
Awards
- 🔥 16th most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Belgium in the CMS category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Canada in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Statamic is more popular than Pico in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Entertainment
Health
Software/Hardware
Online Shopping
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Bludit
Kirby
Strapi🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.