🆚 Statamic vs. Strapi
- 📈 Strapi is noticeably more popular than Statamic.
- 🌎 Strapi is more popular in the United States, France, and Brazil.
- 🌍 Statamic is more popular in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands.
Type
About
Statamic is a flexible content management system built on Laravel that can operate as a full-stack or headless CMS, using flat files or a database, and can generate static sites.
It stores content in Markdown and
YAML by default, includes a customizable control panel, supports version control workflows with
Git, and offers features such as collections, taxonomies, asset management, and form handling.
Strapi is an open-source headless CMS built with Node.js and
TypeScript that connects to various databases and frontend frameworks.
It lets teams define custom content types and schemas, supports REST and GraphQL APIs, provides role-based access control, a media library, internationalization, plugin extensibility, and a fully customizable admin panel.
Headquarters
Pricing
(50K API, 50 GB)$18/month
(1M API, 250 GB)$90/month
(10M API, 1,000 GB)$450/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 15th most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Belgium in the CMS category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Canada in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in India in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in France in the CMS category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the Czech Republic in the CMS category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Russia in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Pico
Sanity