🆚 AEM RUM vs. Sematext
- 📈 AEM RUM is much more popular than Sematext.
- 🌍 AEM RUM is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Application monitoring tool
Application monitoring tool
About
AEM RUM is a real-time user monitoring service that captures Core Web Vitals data for websites built on Adobe Experience Manager.
Sematext is a full-stack observability solution with log management, synthetic monitoring, real user monitoring, and infrastructure monitoring.
Headquarters
San Jose, California, United States
New York, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌Free 14-day trial
Logs$5+/month
Monitoring$2.8+/month
Experience$9+/month
Synthetics$2+/month
Categories
Application Monitoring › Rank #10
Application Monitoring › Rank #38
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The AEM RUM application monitoring tool is 125 times more popular than Sematext.
Total websites
Market share
Application Monitoring
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
AEM RUM is more popular than Sematext in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Germany
France
Italy
Spain
Japan
Brazil
Netherlands
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Japan in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Italy in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Spain in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Portugal in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Austria in the Application Monitoring category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
AEM RUM is more popular than Sematext in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Motor Vehicles
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Travel
Software/Hardware
Fashion/Beauty
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Datadog
DebugBear