🆚 AEM RUM vs. SpeedCurve

Type

Application monitoring tool
Application monitoring tool

About

AEM RUM is a real-time user monitoring service that captures Core Web Vitals data for websites built on Adobe Experience Manager.

SpeedCurve is a website performance monitoring platform that combines synthetic testing, real user monitoring, Lighthouse audits, and Core Web Vitals tracking to measure and improve front-end performance.

It provides lab tests across multiple browsers and locations, RUM with custom metrics and JavaScript error tracking, monitoring of Google Core Web Vitals including LCP, FID, and CLS, performance budgets with alerts, CI/CD integrations, and detailed debugging tools such as waterfall charts, session analysis, and third-party impact tracking.

Headquarters

San Jose, California, United States
Auckland, New Zealand

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
Starter$1+/month
Growth$504+/month
Enterprise$1,470+/month
RUM$135/1M page views/month
Synthetic Monitoring$150/10K checks/month

Categories

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The AEM RUM application monitoring tool is 3 times more popular than SpeedCurve.
Total websites

Market share

Application Monitoring

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

AEM RUM is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while SpeedCurve is more popular in the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Australia
France
Netherlands
Japan
Spain
Italy
Canada

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

AEM RUM is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and finance and banking, while SpeedCurve is more commonly used on fashion and beauty, entertainment, and general news sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Motor Vehicles
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Travel
Fashion/Beauty
Software/Hardware
Internet Services

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#300
#388
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#76
View more ➝

See also

🗃️ About This Data