🆚 AEM RUM vs. SpeedCurve
- 📈 AEM RUM is three times more popular than SpeedCurve.
- 🌎 AEM RUM is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 SpeedCurve is more popular in the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia.
Type
About
AEM RUM is a real-time user monitoring service that captures Core Web Vitals data for websites built on Adobe Experience Manager.
SpeedCurve is a website performance monitoring platform that combines synthetic testing, real user monitoring, Lighthouse audits, and Core Web Vitals tracking to measure and improve front-end performance.
It provides lab tests across multiple browsers and locations, RUM with custom metrics and JavaScript error tracking, monitoring of Google Core Web Vitals including LCP, FID, and CLS, performance budgets with alerts, CI/CD integrations, and detailed debugging tools such as waterfall charts, session analysis, and third-party impact tracking.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Japan in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Italy in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Spain in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Portugal in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Austria in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the Netherlands in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in France in the Application Monitoring category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Datadog
DebugBear