🆚 RUMvision vs. SpeedCurve
- 📈 SpeedCurve is three times more popular than RUMvision.
- 🌎 SpeedCurve is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 RUMvision is more popular in the Netherlands.
SpeedCurveType
About
RUMvision is a real user monitoring solution that allows you to measure, analyse and improve site speed and Core Web Vitals with live visitor data.
SpeedCurve is a website performance monitoring platform that combines synthetic testing, real user monitoring, Lighthouse audits, and Core Web Vitals tracking to measure and improve front-end performance.
It provides lab tests across multiple browsers and locations, RUM with custom metrics and 
JavaScript error tracking, monitoring of Google Core Web Vitals including LCP, FID, and CLS, performance budgets with alerts, CI/CD integrations, and detailed debugging tools such as waterfall charts, session analysis, and third-party impact tracking.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1.5M pageviews)€150/month
(7.5M pageviews)€700/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the Netherlands in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Germany in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the Netherlands in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in France in the Application Monitoring category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Akamai mPulse
Datadog
DebugBear🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.