🆚 Air Datepicker vs. Gijgo
- 📈 Air Datepicker is noticeably more popular than Gijgo.
- 🌎 Air Datepicker is more popular in Russia, the United States, and Germany.
- 🌍 Gijgo is more popular in India, Indonesia, and Turkey.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
GijgoType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Air Datepicker is a customizable datepicker written in pure 
JavaScript without any dependencies.
Gijgo is an open-source set of JavaScript controls that includes grid, tree, dialog, dropdown, slider and date/time pickers.
Headquarters
Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #223
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #247
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Air Datepicker JavaScript library is 1.7 times more popular than Gijgo.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Air Datepicker is more popular in Russia, the United States, and Germany, while Gijgo is more popular in India, Indonesia, and Turkey.
Russia
United States
India
Germany
China
Brazil
Australia
United Kingdom
France
Spain
Awards
- ⬆️ 93rd most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 107th most popular in China in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 217th most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 172nd most popular in India in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 245th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Air Datepicker is more popular among sites focused on business, travel, and marketing and merchandising, while Gijgo is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, Internet services, and government and military sites.
Business
Travel
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Health
Fashion/Beauty
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,815,889 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.