🆚 Akamai mPulse vs. Yottaa
- 📈 Akamai mPulse is much more popular than Yottaa.
- 🌍 Akamai mPulse is more popular in all countries.
Akamai mPulse
YottaaType
About
Akamai mPulse is a real user monitoring (RUM) solution that collects performance and user experience data directly from visitors' browsers to measure how websites and applications behave in real conditions.
It captures over 200 performance and business metrics per session, correlates them with outcomes such as conversions and revenue, provides real-time dashboards and anomaly alerts, and includes features such as Core Web Vitals tracking, third-party resource monitoring, and bot detection.
Yottaa is an e-commerce-focused website optimization platform that improves page speed, strengthens security, and monitors user experience through cloud-based acceleration, analytics, and traffic control.
It combines real user monitoring, Core Web Vitals diagnostics, third-party tag auditing, and anomaly detection with optimization features such as application sequencing that controls script execution order, dynamic browser caching, adaptive image optimization, and integrated CDN and security services.
Headquarters
Pricing
(up to 18M annual pageviews)$12,000/year
(up to 48M annual pageviews)$36,000/year
(up to 200M annual pageviews)$78,000/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Pakistan in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Egypt in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Indonesia in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in the United States in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 48th most popular in the United States in the Conversion Optimization category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Datadog
SpeedCurve
DebugBear
Web Vitals🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.