🆚 AEM RUM vs. Yottaa
- 📈 AEM RUM is four times more popular than Yottaa.
- 🌎 AEM RUM is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌍 Yottaa is more popular in Pakistan.
Type
About
AEM RUM is a real-time user monitoring service that captures Core Web Vitals data for websites built on Adobe Experience Manager.
Yottaa is an e-commerce-focused website optimization platform that improves page speed, strengthens security, and monitors user experience through cloud-based acceleration, analytics, and traffic control.
It combines real user monitoring, Core Web Vitals diagnostics, third-party tag auditing, and anomaly detection with optimization features such as application sequencing that controls script execution order, dynamic browser caching, adaptive image optimization, and integrated CDN and security services.
Headquarters
Pricing
(up to 18M annual pageviews)$12,000/year
(up to 48M annual pageviews)$36,000/year
(up to 200M annual pageviews)$78,000/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Japan in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Italy in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Spain in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Portugal in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Austria in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in the United States in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 48th most popular in the United States in the Conversion Optimization category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Yottaa
Datadog
DebugBear