🆚 Akamai Object Storage vs. Tencent Cloud Object Storage
- 📈 Tencent Cloud Object Storage is slightly more popular than Akamai Object Storage.
- 🌍 Tencent Cloud Object Storage is more popular in China, Hong Kong, and Singapore.
- 🌍 Akamai Object Storage is more popular in Indonesia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service
About
Akamai Object Storage is a globally available, S3-compliant cloud storage service offered as part of the
Akamai Cloud platform, designed for storing and managing unstructured data at scale.
Tencent Cloud Object Storage (COS) is a distributed storage service with Amazon S3-compatible APIs.
Headquarters
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Shenzhen, China
Pricing
Free version ❌
250 GB $5/month
500 GB $10/month
1 TB $20/month
5 TB $100/month
10 TB $200/month
50 TB $1000/month
Categories
Cloud Storages › Rank #16
Cloud Storages › Rank #14
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Tencent Cloud Object Storage service is 1.1 times more popular than Akamai Object Storage.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Storages
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Tencent Cloud Object Storage is more popular in China, Hong Kong, and Singapore, while Akamai Object Storage is more popular in Indonesia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
China
United States
Indonesia
Sweden
United Kingdom
Hong Kong
India
Brazil
Netherlands
Singapore
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Tencent Cloud Object Storage is more popular among sites focused on business, education and reference, and portal sites, while Akamai Object Storage is more commonly used on general news, marketing and merchandising, and sports sites.
Business
General News
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Sports
Education/Reference
Travel
Portal Sites
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.