🆚 Akamai Object Storage vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
- 📈 Akamai Object Storage is much more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
- 🌍 Akamai Object Storage is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Akamai Object StorageType
Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service
About
Akamai Object Storage is a globally available, 
S3-compliant, fault-tolerant storage solution.
Highly available, durable, and secure cloud storage with partial S3 API support.
Headquarters
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Armonk, New York, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
250 GB$5/month
500 GB$10/month
1 TB$20/month
5 TB$100/month
10 TB$200/month
50 TB$1000/month
Free tier ✔️5GB of free storage for 12 months
Categories
Cloud Storages › Rank #14
Cloud Storages › Rank #20
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Akamai Object Storage service is 9 times more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Storages
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Akamai Object Storage is more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage in all countries.
United States
Sweden
Indonesia
United Kingdom
Brazil
India
Italy
Netherlands
Canada
Macedonia
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Akamai Object Storage is more popular among sites focused on general news, sports, and marketing and merchandising, while IBM Cloud Object Storage is more commonly used on finance and banking sites.
General News
Sports
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Internet Services
Travel
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Finance/Banking
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google Cloud Storage
Cloudflare R2
Ceph
Backblaze B2🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.