🆚 Ceph vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
- 📈 Ceph is much more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
- 🌎 Ceph is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 IBM Cloud Object Storage is more popular in Italy.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service
About
Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform that links multiple servers into a single, scalable storage cluster for object, block, and file storage.
It features a scalable architecture, leverages RADOS capabilities including snapshotting, replication, and strong consistency, and supports S3 and
Swift-compatible object APIs.
Highly available, durable, and secure cloud storage with partial S3 API support.
Headquarters
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Armonk, New York, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free tier ✔️ 5GB of free storage for 12 months
Categories
Cloud Storages › Rank #9
Cloud Storages › Rank #21
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Ceph cloud storage service is 18 times more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Storages
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Ceph is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom, while IBM Cloud Object Storage is more popular in Italy.
Germany
United States
United Kingdom
France
Japan
India
Brazil
Canada
Italy
Russia
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Ceph is more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage in all market segments.
Business
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Finance/Banking
Online Shopping
Travel
Motor Vehicles
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
