🆚 Backblaze B2 vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
- 📈 Backblaze B2 is much more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
- 🌎 Backblaze B2 is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Brazil.
- 🌍 IBM Cloud Object Storage is more popular in Italy and Korea.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service
About
Backblaze B2 is a hot cloud object storage service with Amazon S3 compatibility and predictable, usage-based pricing.
It supports both S3-compatible and native APIs, object versioning, lifecycle rules, server-side encryption, and free data egress to selected partners, including Cloudflare,
Fastly, and
Bunny.net.
Highly available, durable, and secure cloud storage with partial S3 API support.
Headquarters
San Mateo, California, United States
Armonk, New York, United States
Pricing
Pay-As-You-Go $6/TB/month
B2 Reserve $1,560/20TB/year
Free tier ✔️ 5GB of free storage for 12 months
Categories
Cloud Storages › Rank #17
Cloud Storages › Rank #21
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Backblaze B2 cloud storage service is 7 times more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Storages
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Backblaze B2 is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Brazil, while IBM Cloud Object Storage is more popular in Italy and Korea.
United States
United Kingdom
Brazil
Netherlands
Canada
Indonesia
Poland
Italy
Germany
Kenya
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Backblaze B2 is more popular among sites focused on business, Internet services, and software and hardware, while IBM Cloud Object Storage is more commonly used on finance and banking, and education and reference sites.
Business
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Real Estate
Auctions/Classifieds
Blogs/Wiki
Finance/Banking
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,827,731 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.