🆚 Apache Sling vs. Apache Wicket

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Backend framework
Backend framework

About

Apache Sling is an open-source web framework that uses a Java Content Repository (JCR), such as Apache Jackrabbit, to store and manage content.

It maps HTTP request URLs to content resources, supports server-side scripting with languages like JSP, JavaScript, Ruby, and Velocity, and integrates with the OSGi framework for modularity.

Apache Wicket is a component-oriented backend framework for Java that enables developers to build dynamic web applications using pure Java and HTML.

It supports reusable components, AJAX functionality, session management, CSRF protection, and integration with authentication libraries such as Shiro and Spring Security.

Headquarters

Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Backend Frameworks › Rank #13
Backend Frameworks › Rank #31

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Apache Sling backend framework is 28 times more popular than Apache Wicket.
Total websites

Market share

Backend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Apache Sling is more popular than Apache Wicket in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Australia
Canada
Spain
Italy
Switzerland
Belgium
Japan

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Apache Sling is more popular than Apache Wicket in all market segments.
Business
Finance/Banking
Motor Vehicles
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Travel
Online Shopping
Software/Hardware
Education/Reference
Internet Services

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,047
#1,070
#3,487
#13,454
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.