🆚 Apache Sling vs. Spring
- 📈 Apache Sling is five times more popular than Spring.
- 🌎 Apache Sling is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Spring is more popular in Poland, Korea, and Nepal.
Type
About
Apache Sling is an open-source web framework that uses a Java Content Repository (JCR), such as Apache Jackrabbit, to store and manage content.
It maps HTTP request URLs to content resources, supports server-side scripting with languages like JSP, JavaScript, Ruby, and Velocity, and integrates with the OSGi framework for modularity.
Spring is a Java framework for building enterprise-grade applications.
It offers a comprehensive ecosystem with features like dependency injection, aspect-oriented programming, transaction management, and support for various data access technologies, including JDBC, JPA, and Hibernate.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Germany in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Australia in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Italy in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Belgium in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Austria in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Poland in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in India in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in France in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in Germany in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the United States in the Backend Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Jakarta Server Pages
Play Framework