🆚 AppTrana WAF vs. Prophaze WAF
- 📈 AppTrana WAF is four times more popular than Prophaze WAF.
- 🌍 AppTrana WAF is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Prophaze WAF is particularly popular in India.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Bot mitigation tool
Bot mitigation tool
About
AppTrana WAF is an AI-powered, fully managed web application firewall with zero-day vulnerability protection. It offers continuous discovery of exposed assets, autonomous virtual patching across web apps and APIs, and behavior-based DDoS and bot mitigation.
Prophaze WAF is a native cloud web application firewall that protects web applications from malicious requests using behavioral threat detection algorithms.
Headquarters
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Clappana, Kerala, India
Pricing
Free version ❌
$99+/app/month
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
Bot Mitigation › Rank #24
Bot Mitigation › Rank #29
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The AppTrana WAF bot mitigation tool is 4 times more popular than Prophaze WAF.
Total websites
Market share
Bot Mitigation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
AppTrana WAF is more popular than Prophaze WAF in all countries.
India
United States
United Arab Emirates
Chile
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
United Kingdom
France
Panama
Nepal
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in India in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in the United States in the Bot Mitigation category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
AppTrana WAF is more popular than Prophaze WAF in all market segments.
Business
Finance/Banking
Education/Reference
Travel
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Real Estate
Tobacco
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
AWS WAF Captcha