🆚 Imperva WAF vs. Prophaze WAF
Imperva WAF is much more popular than Prophaze WAF.- Imperva WAF is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Prophaze WAFType
Web application firewall
Web application firewall
About
Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots.
It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.
Prophaze WAF is a native cloud web application firewall that protects web applications from malicious requests using behavioral threat detection algorithms.
Headquarters
San Mateo, California, United States
Clappana, Kerala, India
Pricing
Free version ❌Free 30-day trial
SecureSphere WAF $7,000+/year
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Imperva WAF technology is 714 times more popular than Prophaze WAF.
Total websites
Market share
WAF
Bot Mitigation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Imperva WAF is more popular than Prophaze WAF in all countries.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Spain
Australia
France
Canada
Italy
New Zealand
Germany
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in New Zealand in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Thailand in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Mexico in the WAF category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the WAF category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Imperva WAF is more popular than Prophaze WAF in all market segments.
Business
Sports
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Health
Government/Military
Entertainment
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,046,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.