🆚 F5 BIG-IP vs. Imperva WAF
- 📈 F5 BIG-IP is twice as popular as Imperva WAF.
- 🌎 F5 BIG-IP is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 Imperva WAF is more popular in New Zealand, Thailand, and Mexico.
Type
About
F5 BIG-IP is an enterprise-grade application delivery controller and full reverse proxy platform for managing, securing, and optimizing web and API traffic.
It offers programmable Layer 4-7 load balancing with advanced health checks, web application firewall protection against OWASP Top 10 threats, DDoS and bot mitigation, and access control and authentication options including Active Directory/LDAP/RADIUS, and single sign-on.
Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots.
It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Turkey in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Saudi Arabia in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Saudi Arabia in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Arab Emirates in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Thailand in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Mexico in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Greece in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Japan in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,619,357 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Imperva WAF
