🆚 ARIA vs. WebAssembly
- 📈 ARIA is much more popular than WebAssembly.
- 🌍 ARIA is more popular in all countries.
ARIA
WebAssemblyType
About
ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) is a technical specification from the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative that defines how to improve the accessibility of web content and applications, particularly those with dynamic interfaces and custom controls.
It provides a set of roles and properties that can be added to 
HTML to describe user interface elements, their relationships, and current states, enabling assistive technologies such as screen readers to interpret widgets, live updates, and complex interactions that are not natively accessible.
WebAssembly (Wasm) is a portable binary instruction format that runs in modern web browsers with near-native performance, enabling frontend coding in languages that were not traditionally used for web interfaces, such as 
C/C++, 
C#, and 
Rust.
It is designed as a low-level compilation target with a compact binary format, fast execution, memory-safe sandboxing, and a stack-based virtual machine. It also integrates with 
JavaScript to access Web APIs and share memory efficiently.
Headquarters
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brunei Darussalam in the Standards category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the Standards category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Standards category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United Kingdom in the Standards category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in France in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in Denmark in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Canada in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Russia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in India in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Sweden in the Standards category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.