🆚 AudioEye vs. VLibras
- 📈 AudioEye is twice as popular as VLibras.
- 🌎 AudioEye is more popular in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 VLibras is more popular in Brazil.
AudioEye
VLibrasType
About
AudioEye is a cloud-based digital accessibility platform that helps organizations achieve compliance with 
WCAG 2.2, ADA, Section 508, AODA, and ACA standards across websites, mobile apps, and digital content.
It combines automated scanning and real-time fixes with expert audits and developer tools, continuously monitors accessibility issues, provides reporting and compliance status tracking, and includes expert guidance and legal support to address complex accessibility requirements.
VLibras is a free, open-source accessibility suite developed with support from the Brazilian Federal Government that translates digital content from Brazilian Portuguese into Brazilian Sign Language to improve access for deaf users.
It supports translation of text, audio, and video through a 3D animated avatar, includes a dictionary with over 17,000 signs, and provides browser extensions, apps, and integration options for websites and digital services.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the Accessibility category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Accessibility category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
UserWay
accessiBe
Ally
EqualWeb
All in One Accessibility
WP Accessibility
ReadSpeaker🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.