🆚 VLibras vs. WP Accessibility
- 📈 WP Accessibility is noticeably more popular than VLibras.
- 🌎 WP Accessibility is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 VLibras is more popular in Brazil.
VLibras
WP AccessibilityType
About
VLibras is a free, open-source accessibility suite developed with support from the Brazilian Federal Government that translates digital content from Brazilian Portuguese into Brazilian Sign Language to improve access for deaf users.
It supports translation of text, audio, and video through a 3D animated avatar, includes a dictionary with over 17,000 signs, and provides browser extensions, apps, and integration options for websites and digital services.
WP Accessibility is a free plugin that enables users to fix a variety of common accessibility issues in 
WordPress themes and plugins.
It provides skip links, enforced alt attributes and media library checks, form labeling, keyboard focus outlines, language and text direction attributes, removal of problematic attributes, and diagnostic tools such as color contrast testing and 
CSS-based issue highlighting.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Accessibility category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Accessibility category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Hungary in the Accessibility category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the Czech Republic in the Accessibility category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Poland in the Accessibility category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in France in the Accessibility category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
UserWay
accessiBe
Ally
AudioEye
ReadSpeaker
Yoast SEO🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.