🆚 Bitbucket vs. Codeberg
- 📈 Bitbucket is noticeably more popular than Codeberg.
- 🌎 Bitbucket is more popular in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Codeberg is more popular in Germany, France, and Vietnam.
BitbucketType
About
Bitbucket is a 
Git-based code hosting and collaboration platform for professional teams that supports repository management, code review, and built-in CI/CD workflows.
It provides pull requests with inline diff views, branch permissions and merge checks for access control, and project-based repository organization.
Codeberg is a non-profit collaboration platform for hosting and developing free and open-source software projects, built on the 
Forgejo Git-based software forge.
It provides Git repository hosting, issue tracking, pull requests, code review, and wikis, and extends these with services such as 
Codeberg Pages for static site hosting, integrated CI/CD through Woodpecker CI and Forgejo Actions, and Weblate-based translation tools.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Code Hosting category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the CI/CD category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the CI/CD category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the Code Hosting category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the CI/CD category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the CI/CD category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Germany in the Code Hosting category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the United States in the Code Hosting category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
GitHub
GitLab
Gitea
Cgit
Gogs
Atlassian company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.