🆚 Bitbucket vs. Travis CI
- 📈 Bitbucket is four times more popular than Travis CI.
- 🌍 Bitbucket is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Code hosting platform
CI/CD tool
About
Bitbucket is a
Git-based code hosting and collaboration platform for professional teams that supports repository management, code review, and built-in CI/CD workflows.
It provides pull requests with inline diff views, branch permissions and merge checks for access control, and project-based repository organization.
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia
Pricing
Free version ✔️1 GB of storage per repository + 1 GB of Git LFS
Standard for 5 users$3.30/user/month
Premium for 5 users$6.60/user/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Bitbucket code hosting platform is 4 times more popular than Travis CI.
Total websites
Market share
CI/CD
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Bitbucket is more popular than Travis CI in all countries.
United States
Germany
Australia
United Kingdom
France
Poland
Russia
Canada
Switzerland
Netherlands
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Code Hosting category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the CI/CD category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the CI/CD category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the Code Hosting category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Bitbucket is more popular among sites focused on software and hardware, technical information, and Internet services, while Travis CI is more commonly used on personal pages sites.
Software/Hardware
Technical Information
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Technical/Business Forums
Games
Personal Pages
Interactive Web Applications
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.