🆚 BitNinja vs. Oracle WAF
- 📈 Oracle WAF is three times more popular than BitNinja.
- 🌎 Oracle WAF is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Brazil.
- 🌍 BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Romania, and Poland.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Website security tool
Bot mitigation tool
About
BitNinja is a server security suite with a centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered
Linux malware scanner, IP reputation, WAF, and spam detection.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a cloud-based, PCI-compliant, global security service that protects applications from malicious and unwanted internet traffic.
Headquarters
Debrecen, Hungary
Austin, Texas, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️ For servers with up to 2 CPU cores and 2MB RAM
Depends on server specs and user count $5+/month
Free version ❌
Instance $5/month
Requests $0.6/1M requests/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Oracle WAF bot mitigation tool is 3 times more popular than BitNinja.
Total websites
Market share
Bot Mitigation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Oracle WAF is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Brazil, while BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Romania, and Poland.
United States
Spain
Japan
Brazil
United Kingdom
Canada
Romania
Poland
Jamaica
Mexico
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Oracle WAF is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and sports, while BitNinja is more commonly used on entertainment sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Sports
Finance/Banking
Travel
Government/Military
Fashion/Beauty
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.


