🆚 BitNinja vs. Oracle WAF
- 📈 Oracle WAF is three times more popular than BitNinja.
- 🌎 Oracle WAF is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Japan.
- 🌍 BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Romania, and the Netherlands.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Oracle WAFType
Website security tool
Bot mitigation tool
About
BitNinja is a server security suite with a centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered 
Linux malware scanner, IP reputation, WAF, and spam detection.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a cloud-based, PCI-compliant, global security service that protects applications from malicious and unwanted internet traffic.
Headquarters
Debrecen, Hungary
Austin, Texas, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️For servers with up to 2 CPU cores and 2MB RAM
Depends on server specs and user count$5+/month
Free version ❌
Instance$5/month
Requests$0.6/1M requests/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Oracle WAF bot mitigation tool is 2.9 times more popular than BitNinja.
Total websites
Market share
Bot Mitigation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Oracle WAF is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Japan, while BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Romania, and the Netherlands.
United States
Spain
Canada
Japan
Brazil
United Kingdom
Romania
Netherlands
Poland
Italy
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Oracle WAF is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and finance and banking, while BitNinja is more commonly used on entertainment and blogs and wiki sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Finance/Banking
Sports
Travel
Online Shopping
Government/Military
Education/Reference
Recreation/Hobbies
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
AWS WAF Captcha🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.