🆚 AppTrana WAF vs. BitNinja
- 📈 AppTrana WAF is slightly more popular than BitNinja.
- 🌎 AppTrana WAF is more popular in India, the United States, and the United Arab Emirates.
- 🌍 BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Poland, and Romania.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Bot mitigation tool
Website security tool
About
AppTrana WAF is an AI-powered, fully managed web application firewall with zero-day vulnerability protection. It offers continuous discovery of exposed assets, autonomous virtual patching across web apps and APIs, and behavior-based DDoS and bot mitigation.
BitNinja is a server security suite with a centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered 
Linux malware scanner, IP reputation, WAF, and spam detection.
Headquarters
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Debrecen, Hungary
Pricing
Free version ❌
$99+/app/month
Free version ✔️ For servers with up to 2 CPU cores and 2MB RAM
Depends on server specs and user count $5+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The AppTrana WAF bot mitigation tool is 1.1 times more popular than BitNinja.
Total websites
Market share
Bot Mitigation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
AppTrana WAF is more popular in India, the United States, and the United Arab Emirates, while BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Poland, and Romania.
India
United States
Spain
United Arab Emirates
Poland
United Kingdom
Romania
Netherlands
Hungary
Brazil
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
AppTrana WAF is more popular among sites focused on business, education and reference, and finance and banking, while BitNinja is more commonly used on entertainment sites.
Business
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Finance/Banking
Travel
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Tobacco
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.