🆚 BitNinja vs. Suhosin
- 📈 Suhosin is twice as popular as BitNinja.
- 🌎 Suhosin is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the Czech Republic.
- 🌍 BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Romania, and Thailand.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Website security tool
Website security tool
About
BitNinja is a server security suite with a centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered
Linux malware scanner, IP reputation, WAF, and spam detection.
Suhosin is an advanced protection system for PHP 5, designed to protect servers and users from known and unknown flaws in PHP applications and the PHP core.
Headquarters
Debrecen, Hungary
Bonn, Germany
Pricing
Free version ✔️For servers with up to 2 CPU cores and 2MB RAM
Depends on server specs and user count$5+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Suhosin security tool is 2.2 times more popular than BitNinja.
Total websites
Market share
Security
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Suhosin is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the Czech Republic, while BitNinja is more popular in Spain, Romania, and Thailand.
United States
Germany
Czech Republic
Spain
Russia
Ukraine
Hungary
Poland
United Kingdom
Bulgaria
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Security category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Security category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Suhosin is more popular among sites focused on business, Internet services, and education and reference, while BitNinja is more commonly used on entertainment and blogs and wiki sites.
Entertainment
Business
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Sports
Marketing/Merchandising
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Art/Culture/Heritage
Travel
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
AWS WAF Captcha