🆚 Bloomreach Experience Manager vs. dotCMS
- 📈 Bloomreach Experience Manager is twice as popular as dotCMS.
- 🌍 Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular in the Netherlands, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 dotCMS is more popular in the United States, Italy, and Australia.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Bloomreach Experience Manager (brXM) is a Java-based digital experience platform available under open source and enterprise licenses.
dotCMS is a scalable, Java-based, open source content management system.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
BrXM Cloud$100,000+/year
Free version ✔️For companies with < $5M total finances, open source
On request
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Bloomreach Experience Manager CMS is 2.1 times more popular than dotCMS.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular in the Netherlands, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while dotCMS is more popular in the United States, Italy, and Australia.
Netherlands
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
Australia
Canada
Poland
Sweden
France
Awards
- 🔥 12nd most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 62nd most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 51st most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular among sites focused on business, education and reference, and government and military, while dotCMS is more commonly used on health, software and hardware, and restaurants sites.
Business
Education/Reference
Government/Military
Finance/Banking
Health
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Public Information
Fashion/Beauty
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.