🆚 dotCMS vs. Edlio CMS
- 📈 Edlio CMS is three times more popular than dotCMS.
- 🌎 Edlio CMS is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
- 🌍 dotCMS is more popular in Australia, Italy, and the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
dotCMS is a scalable, Java-based, open source content management system.
Edlio is a content management system for K-12 schools and districts that is packed with features designed specifically for teachers and school administrators.
Headquarters
Miami, Florida, United States
Glendale, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️For companies with < $5M total finances, open source
On request
$2 per student/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Edlio CMS platform is 2.6 times more popular than dotCMS.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Edlio CMS is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, while dotCMS is more popular in Australia, Italy, and the United Kingdom.
United States
Canada
Australia
Italy
United Kingdom
Germany
Portugal
Mexico
Netherlands
Switzerland
Awards
- ⬆️ 51st most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Edlio CMS is more popular among sites focused on education and reference, sports, and religion and ideology, while dotCMS is more commonly used on business, health, and finance and banking sites.
Education/Reference
Business
Health
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Software/Hardware
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Religion/Ideology
Online Shopping
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.