🆚 Bloomreach Experience Manager vs. Ibexa DXP
- 📈 Ibexa DXP is slightly more popular than Bloomreach Experience Manager.
- 🌍 Ibexa DXP is more popular in France, Germany, and Canada.
- 🌎 Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular in the Netherlands, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Bloomreach Experience Manager
Ibexa DXPType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Bloomreach Experience Manager (brXM) is a 
Java-based digital experience platform available under open-source and enterprise licenses.
PHP
Symfony
GraphQLHeadquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Oslo, Norway
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Open source
BrXM Cloud $100,000+/year
Free version ✔️ Open source
Ibexa Headless €30,000+/year
Ibexa Experience €38,000+/year
Ibexa Commerce €45,000+/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Ibexa DXP CMS platform is 1.2 times more popular than Bloomreach Experience Manager.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Ibexa DXP is more popular in France, Germany, and Canada, while Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular in the Netherlands, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
Netherlands
France
Germany
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Spain
Norway
Austria
Poland
Awards
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in France in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 39th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Ibexa DXP is more popular among sites focused on finance and banking, travel, and art, culture and heritage, while Bloomreach Experience Manager is more commonly used on business, government and military, and education and reference sites.
Business
Finance/Banking
Travel
Government/Military
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Public Information
Health
Fashion/Beauty
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.