🆚 Bloomreach Experience Manager vs. Ibexa DXP
- 📈 Bloomreach Experience Manager is slightly more popular than Ibexa DXP.
- 🌎 Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular in the Netherlands, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Ibexa DXP is more popular in France, Germany, and Canada.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Bloomreach Experience Manager (brXM) is a Java-based digital experience platform available under open source and enterprise licenses.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Oslo, Norway
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
BrXM Cloud$100,000+/year
Free version ✔️Open source
Ibexa Headless€30,000+/year
Ibexa Experience€38,000+/year
Ibexa Commerce€45,000+/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Bloomreach Experience Manager CMS is 1.2 times more popular than Ibexa DXP.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular in the Netherlands, the United States, and the United Kingdom, while Ibexa DXP is more popular in France, Germany, and Canada.
Netherlands
France
Germany
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Spain
Austria
Poland
Portugal
Awards
- 🔥 12nd most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 62nd most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in France in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 44th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Bloomreach Experience Manager is more popular among sites focused on business, education and reference, and finance and banking, while Ibexa DXP is more commonly used on travel, art, culture and heritage, and real estate sites.
Business
Education/Reference
Finance/Banking
Travel
Government/Military
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Public Information
Health
Fashion/Beauty
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.